Skip to main content

The 3 Cs of Character

For storytellers, this sentence is as important as it is simple:

A person with a particular characteristic goes through conflict and is changed.

That's your story, right there, buckeroo. A character, a conflict, a change. These three elements give you your beginning (character), middle (conflict), and end (change).

Now comes the part where I pick it to death for hidden meaning, me being the over-analysing, left-brained ape that I am.

Characteristic

We learn about the protagonist's 'particular characteric' early. That's because typically the protagonist is tested at the Act One end crisis, and the particular characteristic makes thing a LOT worse instead of fixing the problem. Oh, to heck with it — let's just go ahead and call the characteristic exactly what it is: the hero's flaw.

The hero's flaw is the thing that makes us shake our heads and groan: "Geez, he's his own worst enemy!" It's the thing restraining the hero from reaching his or her true potential. In some way it's also the thing fueling the external conflict going on around the hero.

The hero may or may not be aware of this character flaw. Does Jack Nicholson's character in As Good As It Gets know he's a righteous A-hole? Of course he does. Arguably it makes the character arc more powerful: the hero can see the problem but is powerless (or refuses) to correct it. There ain't gonna be a whole lot of internal struggle going on if the hero can't see a problem with his own behaviour.

As a guideline, you'll be aiming to spin this characteristic 180 degrees by the end of the story. That task is one of the many joys of creation, because you get to play the eeevil genius, rubbing your hands together and gurgling a throaty muhahaHAHAHAHAHA while you plot to transform your naive farmboy into a victorious knight, your suffering servant into a graceful princess, your arrogant king into humble farmer. Storylines with those beginnings and endings have been told millions of times -- the difference lies in the stuff that happens in between.

Conflict

Conflict happens when there is pressure to change the characteristic. Few of us willingly change just for the heck of it. Something has to shake us out of our comfy hammock. Something gets in the Hero's way, or the Hero gets in the way of something. The status quo cannot hold and conflict is the inevitable result.

Naturally, in trying to maintain the status quo, the hero will fall back on behaviours that worked previously. The flaw could not have survived thus far without the protagonist nurturing and sustaining it with a supporting framework of behaviours and attitudes, reinforced and refined over time.

All of that is no good now. The hero faces this new rising conflict and can resolve it only by changing his/her flawed characteristic.

Change

Resolving the flaw frees the protagonist to act authentically. This moment of honest, enlightened action is the key to resolving the external conflict.

Even if the world returns to the way it was prior to the conflict, the hero is irrevocably transformed forever. At the very least, the hero exhibits a new set of behaviours and beliefs that replace the flawed ones.

Change makes your story meaningful. Without it, the journey is meaningless.

You can begin crafting a story based on any one or more of those three elements. It might be an idea for a character, an exciting action scene, a gangbuster climax. But at some point, you'll need to add the missing elements and figure out how they fit together. If you reach a point during your storycrafting where you've lost your focus and the story is floundering (writers block), go back and review the 3 Cs of your main character. That one simple sentence will lead you back on track.

[end]

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Andrew Stanton (PIXAR) - transcript - Keynote, Screenwriting Expo 5 (2006), Understanding Story: or My Journey of Pain

UPDATE, March 2012: New TED 2012 Talk by Andrew Stanton, covering much of the same material recorded here. READABILITY TIP:  For easier reading and to prevent eye strain, narrow the width of your browser tab to reflow the text into shorter lines. I recommend a words-per-line count of 12 to 15. As soon as I found it on Google Video, I knew I would have to transcribe it. Here is all of Andrew Stanton's keynote from Screenwriting Expo 5 (2006). He named it: "Understanding Story: or My Journey of Pain." I have not transcribed the Q&A that followed the keynote. Perhaps I will tackle it one day. Not for a while -- this transcription consumed quite a few of my nights, and I'm happy to be done with it. And now that I can look at it from head to toe, I can see it was worth every coffee-fueled keystroke. With Stanton's experiences and lessons to guide us, we cannot fail to become better storytellers. Note: Andrew talks FAST, so this transcript

The 4-Act Story Diamond

Update: new version of the 4-Act Story Diamond graphic here . Update 2  (2023): Even more 4-act structure , courtesy of Stan Williams. I don't believe in the three-act screenplay story structure. It's four acts, plain and simple. I said so ten years ago on Jack Stanley's Scrnwrit list, and nothing has changed since. Four acts, no more, no less. I'm sorry those screenwriting gurus sold you on three acts and then five acts and then seven acts or -- what are we up to now? Nine? Twelve? Look, we're all grasping for the magic template that will reign in the chaos and tame our wild stories, so I don't blame you for listening to those guys. The four acts were there all along and the screenwriting gurus knew it, or at least sensed it. Certainly Syd Field knew it, although he failed to make a clean break from the dogmatic Aristotle three-act structure . I swear, if I hear once more that line about "Get your hero up a tree, throw rocks at him, then get him

4-Act Story Diamond v2

This model represents the Hero's Journey in four acts. It supplements my old story diamond. Click the image for a larger view. Discussion about the eight plot points is here .